International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering
ISSN Approved Journal | Impact factor: 8.771 | ESTD: 2013 | Follows UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines
| Monthly, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Scholarly, Multidisciplinary and Open Access Journal | High Impact Factor 8.771 (Calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool | Indexing in all Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator | Digital Object Identifier (DOI) |
| TITLE | Effectiveness of Computer Technology in Education System for Social Science |
|---|---|
| ABSTRACT | Education is an important tool for the sustainable development of any country, Computer technology is an essential part of the education which started from the initial classes. Education departments are advertising for the promotion of computer technology among school-going teenagers in public schools as well as private schools. Students need to have an e-futuristic mindset. It raises questions about the effectiveness of promotional advertisements for computer education and the success of the computer program. The education policy of the government has appeared to provide computers in low-income areas and it has been supported by academia, educational institutions, and philanthropic discussions. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study of computer equipped schools. A comparative study was conducted in five government schools which are located in urban areas and five schools located in rural areas in five different blocks of Ranchi district, of Jharkhand state of India, Statistical analysis was done using student t-test, Chi-square test, and fisher-exact test. |
| AUTHOR | DR. CHANCHAL RATHORE Assistant Professor, RNT College of B.Ed & BSTC, Chittorgarh, India |
| VOLUME | 180 |
| DOI | DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2026.1401010 |
| pdf/10_Effectiveness of Computer Technology in Education System for Social Science.pdf | |
| KEYWORDS | |
| References | 1. Selby, C. C. (2015). Relationships: Computational thinking, the pedagogy of programming, and Bloom’s Taxonomy. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 80–87). New York, NY: ACM. 2. Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C.(2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding a 21st-century problem-solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60, 565–568. doi:10.1007/ s11528-016-0087-7. 3. S. Furber. (2012). Shut Down or Restart? The Way Forward for Computing in UK Schools. The Royal Society, London. 4. J. Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. CACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 33–35. 5. Linebarger, D. L., & Chernin, A. R. (2003).Young children, parents, computers, and the internet. IT & Society, 1(4), 87–106. 6. P. Hubwieser. (2012). CS education in secondary schools—The introduction of a new compulsory subject. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 12, 4 (2012), 16. 7. Linden, L., Banerjee, A. V. et al. (2003). Computer-assisted learning: evidence from a randomised experiment.MIT Poverty Action Lab Working Paper Series, 5. 8. Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home Computers and School Performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10. 9. Lindlof, T.(1992). Computing tales: Parents' discourse about technology and family.Social Science Computer Review, 10,291–301. 10. Downes, T. (1999). Children's and parents' discourses about computers in the home and school. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 5(4), 104. 11. Arunachalam, S. (1999).Information and knowledge in the age of electronic communication: a developing country perspective. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 465. 12. Prabhakaran S. Mental status of adolescent girls residing in a university [2]hostel. The Indian J Nutr and Dietetics. 2003; 40:274-79. 13. Sawyer A. Hunley, James H.Evans, Maria Delgado-Hachey, Judy Krise, Tammy Rich & Connie shell(2005).Adolescent computer use and academic achievement vol.40, No.158 14. Nurassyl Kerimbayev, Aliya Akramova and Nurgul Azieva(2014) Evaluation of educational activities ungraded school teachers: development resources to improve the quality of teaching in a rural school 1-7 15. Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L., & Williams, G. W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 19. 16. Susan, A., Anderson, E.et.al (2016).Designing Computer-Supported Complex Systems Curricula for the Next Generation Science Standards in High School Science Classrooms, System 38(4) 2-18. 17. Cardinal, c., & Banerjee,p (2001).Perceived Level of Computer Competence Among School and Community Health Education Students. The Health Educator 17-21 18. [CSTAandISTE].(2011).Computational thinking: Leadership toolkit. (1stEd.).Retrievedfromhttp://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/471.11CTLeadershipt Toolkit-SP-Fv pdf. 19. Peter Mozelius, Kalelur Rahuman and G. N. Wikramanayake(2012) A Sri Lankan one-to-one computing initiative and its impact on formal learning in Primary School Education and General Studies Vol. 1 (1), pp. 016 – 021. 20. R. Hakeem, J. Thomas & S. H. Badruddin (2002) Urbanisation and activity pattern of south Asian Children, Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 21. Tatnall, A. & Davey, B. (2017).In Streams in the history of computer education in Australia an overview of the school and university computer education. 22. Iflah Naseem, Ashirr K Kashyap & Dheeraj Mandloi (2016) Improvising rural education system A digitalised Step towards development, International Research Journal of Indian languages, Vol 4, Issue 6 178-181. |
